<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mediawatch article on raid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid</link>
	<description>Scientology Protests Adelaide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:34:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brownie14</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Brownie14</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-424</guid>
		<description>This post is awesome. I&#039;m impressed by your style - experienced blogger, huh? Added your blog to my favs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is awesome. I&#8217;m impressed by your style &#8211; experienced blogger, huh? Added your blog to my favs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzie Cheel</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzie Cheel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Seems different from your previous posts. Did YOU write this post, or someone else did? Anyway, I think your readers really enjoyed reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems different from your previous posts. Did YOU write this post, or someone else did? Anyway, I think your readers really enjoyed reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crashcrash07</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>crashcrash07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-390</guid>
		<description>To be sincere, I have never been here before, and as a new person I can say that this website looks amazing. I really enjoy it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be sincere, I have never been here before, and as a new person I can say that this website looks amazing. I really enjoy it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon SA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anon response to Media Watch omission</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon SA &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anon response to Media Watch omission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-132</guid>
		<description>[...] noted previously, Media Watch did a piece on Scientology and News Corp.&#8217;s oversensitivity with them. One member of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noted previously, Media Watch did a piece on Scientology and News Corp.&#8217;s oversensitivity with them. One member of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Munkee_Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Munkee_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-105</guid>
		<description>@AnonymooseSmith &gt; The Media Watch article in this post focuses only on News Ltd. (Murdoch) Articles. Channel 7 may have been nice to us but the jury is still out on us as far as the Australian Media is concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AnonymooseSmith > The Media Watch article in this post focuses only on News Ltd. (Murdoch) Articles. Channel 7 may have been nice to us but the jury is still out on us as far as the Australian Media is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonette</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-104</guid>
		<description>I watched Mediawatch last night, and saw this. I thought it was excellent. So glad they attacked the &#039;Tiser and their editing of the signs which made us look, quite frankly, stupid. 

I applaud Mediawatch&#039;s astuteness in covering this, especially in the supportive-of-us way that it did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched Mediawatch last night, and saw this. I thought it was excellent. So glad they attacked the &#8216;Tiser and their editing of the signs which made us look, quite frankly, stupid. </p>
<p>I applaud Mediawatch&#8217;s astuteness in covering this, especially in the supportive-of-us way that it did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymooseSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymooseSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Channel nine is most definitely biased against Anonymous, but channel seven is run by Murdoch, and they did a fairly objective piece on it. Hopefully we can incite a media war at some point. ;D

Channel ten, though, has yet to touch it, strangely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel nine is most definitely biased against Anonymous, but channel seven is run by Murdoch, and they did a fairly objective piece on it. Hopefully we can incite a media war at some point. ;D</p>
<p>Channel ten, though, has yet to touch it, strangely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing also most Australian news will be bias against Anonymous, James Packer is Scientologist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing also most Australian news will be bias against Anonymous, James Packer is Scientologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymooseSmith</title>
		<link>http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/mediawatch-article-on-raid/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonymooseSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anonsa.org/2008/02/26/mediawatch-article-on-raid#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Holy jesus that&#039;s a good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy jesus that&#8217;s a good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
